As if the slutbot didn’t give us enough to worry about, spammers and other net-baddies are ramping up their use of holiday e-cards to distribute malware, according to the Christian Science Monitor. “While malicious e-cards are not a new problem,” says the Monitor, “their numbers have grown, their tactics have improved, and their victims are still falling for it.”
It gives a couple examples of this year’s ploys:
One suspicious e-card crawling the Web this year tries to exploit users’ feistier side. When opened, the e-mail loads an image of a rascal throwing a snowball at your screen. “You have just been hit with an e-mail snowball!” reads the card, which Symantec included in its December spam report. The card tells readers to forward it on to friends and share the fun … “Each time the e-mail is read, a request is sent to the server hosting the image, and the user’s e-mail address is stored … on the spammer’s server,” says the Symantec report. So, next time the spammer wants to send out junk mail, he has a fresh list of addresses.
Another of this year’s crop put a professional polish on an old trick. The card used Hallmark’s official logo and a convincing e-card template to hide its intentions. All the links led to Hallmark.com, except the line “To see it, click here.” That link would download a program onto your computer that unlocks the PC to hackers.
In my mind I have an image of the Grinch sitting in his icy hovel tapping at his keyboard, that big, diabolical grin spreading across his face.
So this is the real War on Christmas. Maybe we should tell O’Reilly (Bill, that is, not Tim).
But it gets worse. Andrew Sullivan points to this.
Speaking of the slutbot, I saw crazyman David Levy’s book Love and Sex with Robots while at the bookstore today. I guess publishers will take anything that has “sex” in the title. Surprisingly, the index doesn’t mention Westworld anywhere, so I don’t think it can be that well-researched. (It does mention the notorious RealDoll in five different places, though. Too bad I forgot to look for the HAL-9000.) Is this what they mean by “progress”?