{"id":88,"date":"2005-08-19T08:53:45","date_gmt":"2005-08-19T14:53:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=88"},"modified":"2005-08-19T08:53:45","modified_gmt":"2005-08-19T14:53:45","slug":"googles_4000000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=88","title":{"rendered":"Google&#8217;s $4,000,000,000 question"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It takes a hell of a lot of capital to build a utility. A hundred years ago, when Samuel Insull began making the investments that would lead to the first large-scale electric utility, Commonwealth Edison, a lot of people thought he was crazy. He first bought up all the little mom-and-pop generating stations around Chicago, then he closed them all down and replaced them with a giant central station operating mammoth new generators. He literally had to beg suppliers to build the huge turbines he needed. They couldn&#8217;t imagine anyone needing that kind of capacity. They were wrong. Within a few years, Insull was one of the richest men in America.<\/p>\n<p>Google&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/battellemedia.com\/archives\/001807.php\">announcement yesterday<\/a> that it would raise $4 billion in capital with a second stock offering underscores its ambition to become the world&#8217;s first great computing utility. With $3 billion already in the bank and tons of dollars being generated through its current operations, it&#8217;s going to have a massive amount of cash to invest in expanding its data centers, buying up fiber-optic network capacity, pioneering new technologies, and acquiring other companies. As leading tech analyst Mark Stahlman <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/ap\/financialnews\/D8C2M6JG0.htm?campaign_id=apn_tech_down&#038;chan=tc\">put it<\/a>, &#8220;&#8221;There&#8217;s a lot of infrastructure that they need to build &#8230; a couple hundred thousand more servers, a bunch of dark fiber, maybe a few data centers.&#8221; As someone who believes that most computing services will ultimately be provided, in one form or another, by utilities, I think the kind of investments in centralized infrastructure that Google is making will serve customers well.<\/p>\n<p>But will those vast capital outlays serve Google&#8217;s investors well? I seriously doubt it. Given Google&#8217;s stratospheric stock price, it will have to earn enormous returns on those billions of dollars of capital if investors are to make out well in the long run. It&#8217;s doubtful that Google&#8217;s current business model &#8211; selling advertising &#8211; will generate those kinds of returns. When Insull built his electric utility, he was paid directly for the electricity he produced &#8211; and because companies and consumers always needed power, the revenue streams were protected from the vagaries of the business cycle. Advertising is a different beast. It&#8217;s highly cyclical, with big highs and low lows. The revenues are unsteady. And unlike electric utilities, which had monopolies over local supply, advertising is a highly competitive business.<\/p>\n<p>I certainly don&#8217;t mind having starstruck investors pay for the buildout of infrastructure that will provide many benefits to many, many people, including myself. But if I were one of those investors, I&#8217;d be thinking hard about how exactly Google is going to be making money in the future. Stahlman says that &#8220;the mistake here is people think that Google is somehow an advertising company and therefore in the media business. They&#8217;re not. They&#8217;re in the infrastructure business.&#8221; Well, they&#8217;re making investments like an infrastructure company, i.e., a utility, but they&#8217;re making money like a media company. The question is: Is that sustainable?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>How long can a capital-intensive utility thrive by just selling ads?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=88"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=88"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=88"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=88"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}