{"id":644,"date":"2007-01-03T21:58:30","date_gmt":"2007-01-04T04:58:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=644"},"modified":"2016-01-06T14:11:17","modified_gmt":"2016-01-06T21:11:17","slug":"it_doesnt_matte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=644","title":{"rendered":"IT doesn&#8217;t matter, part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><em>Advertisement<br \/>\n<\/em><\/span>Now available: Nicholas Carr&#8217;s acclaimed new\u00a0book, The Glass Cage<em><br \/>\n<\/em>&#8220;Essential&#8221; \u2013New York Times<br \/>\n&#8220;Elegant&#8221; \u2013Wall Street Journal<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0393240762\/routyp-20\">Order Now from Amazon.com<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em>In the following\u00a0article, originally published in the May 2003 edition of the\u00a0<\/em>Harvard Business Review<i>,\u00a0<\/i><em>I examine the evolution of information technology in business and show that it follows a pattern strikingly similar to that of earlier technologies like railroads and electric power. For a brief period, as they are being built into the infrastructure of commerce, these &#8220;infrastructural technologies,&#8221; as I call them, open opportunities for forward-looking companies to gain strong competitive advantages. But as their availability increases and their cost decreases &#8211; as they become ubiquitous &#8211; they become commodity inputs. They may be more essential than ever to the economy and to society, but from a strategic business standpoint, they become invisible; they no longer matter. The staff of HBR voted &#8220;IT Doesn&#8217;t Matter&#8221; the best article to appear in the magazine during 2003. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The article\u00a0caused quite a stir &#8211; I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nicholasgcarr.com\/articles\/matter.html\">documented the controversy<\/a> as it unfolded &#8211; and it continues to be a lightning rod for debate in IT circles.\u00a0<\/em><em>I went on to greatly expand the argument of the article, and clarify a few of its points, in the 2004 book <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nicholasgcarr.com\/doesitmatter.html\">Does IT Matter?<\/a>, which you can order <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/1591394449\/routyp-20\">here<\/a>. You can also purchase the full text of &#8220;IT Doesn&#8217;t Matter,&#8221; in its original form, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/B00009MBYN\/routyp-20\">here<\/a>. The original article includes some additional sidebars and graphics as well as many pages of letters written to HBR in response to the article.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>IT doesn&#8217;t matter<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In 1968, a young Intel engineer named Ted Hoff found a way to put the circuits necessary for computer processing onto a tiny piece of silicon. His invention of the microprocessor spurred a series of technological breakthroughs \u2013 desktop computers, local and wide area networks, enterprise software, and the Internet \u2013 that have transformed the business world. Today, no one would dispute that information technology has become the backbone of commerce. It underpins the operations of individual companies, ties together far-flung supply chains, and, increasingly, links businesses to the customers they serve. Hardly a dollar or a euro changes hands anymore without the aid of computer systems.<\/p>\n<p>As IT\u2019s power and presence have expanded, companies have come to view it as a resource ever more critical to their success, a fact clearly reflected in their spending habits. In 1965, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce\u2019s Bureau of Economic Analysis, less than 5% of the capital expenditures of American companies went to information technology. After the introduction of the personal computer in the early 1980s, that percentage rose to 15%. By the early 1990s, it had reached more than 30%, and by the end of the decade it had hit nearly 50%. Even with the recent sluggishness in technology spending, businesses around the world continue to spend well over $2 trillion a year on IT.<\/p>\n<p>But the veneration of IT goes much deeper than dollars. It is evident as well in the shifting attitudes of top managers. Twenty years ago, most executives looked down on computers as proletarian tools \u2013 glorified typewriters and calculators \u2013 best relegated to low-level employees like secretaries, analysts, and technicians. It was the rare executive who would let his fingers touch a keyboard, much less incorporate information technology into his strategic thinking. Today, that has changed completely. Chief executives now routinely talk about the strategic value of information technology, about how they can use IT to gain a competitive edge, about the \u201cdigitization\u201d of their business models. Most have appointed chief information officers to their senior management teams, and many have hired strategy consulting firms to provide fresh ideas on how to leverage their IT investments for differentiation and advantage.<\/p>\n<p>Behind the change in thinking lies a simple assumption: that as IT\u2019s potency and ubiquity have increased, so too has its strategic value. It\u2019s a reasonable assumption, even an intuitive one. But it\u2019s mistaken. What makes a resource truly strategic \u2013 what gives it the capacity to be the basis for a sustained competitive advantage \u2013 is not ubiquity but scarcity. You only gain an edge over rivals by having or doing something that they can\u2019t have or do. By now, the core functions of IT \u2013 data storage, data processing, and data transport \u2013 have become available and affordable to all. Their very power and presence have begun to transform them from potentially strategic resources into commodity factors of production. They are becoming costs of doing business that must be paid by all but provide distinction to none.<\/p>\n<p>IT is best seen as the latest in a series of broadly adopted technologies that have reshaped industry over the past two centuries \u2013 from the steam engine and the railroad to the telegraph and the telephone to the electric generator and the internal combustion engine. For a brief period, as they were being built into the infrastructure of commerce, all these technologies opened opportunities for forward-looking companies to gain real advantages. But as their availability increased and their cost decreased \u2013 as they became ubiquitous \u2013 they became commodity inputs. From a strategic standpoint, they became invisible; they no longer mattered. That is exactly what is happening to information technology today, and the implications for corporate IT management are profound.<\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/archives\/2007\/01\/it_doesnt_matte_1.php\">Part 2<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Advertisement Now available: Nicholas Carr&#8217;s acclaimed new\u00a0book, The Glass Cage &#8220;Essential&#8221; \u2013New York Times &#8220;Elegant&#8221; \u2013Wall Street Journal Order Now from Amazon.com In the following\u00a0article, originally published in the May 2003 edition of the\u00a0Harvard Business Review,\u00a0I examine the evolution of information technology in business and show that it follows a pattern strikingly similar to that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-644","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/644","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=644"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/644\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6722,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/644\/revisions\/6722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=644"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=644"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=644"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}