{"id":581,"date":"2006-11-14T08:52:37","date_gmt":"2006-11-14T15:52:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=581"},"modified":"2006-11-14T08:52:37","modified_gmt":"2006-11-14T15:52:37","slug":"links_arent_mes_1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=581","title":{"rendered":"Links aren&#8217;t messy anymore"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Hyperlinks,&#8221; David Weinberger <a href=\"http:\/\/cluetrain.com\/book\/hyperorg.html\">wrote<\/a> in the Cluetrain Manifesto, &#8220;subvert hierarchy &#8230; Hyperlinks have no symmetry, no plan. They are messy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I found those words through &#8211; surprise &#8211; a hyperlink. And I found that link, via another link, on Doc Searls&#8217;s blog, where today he <a href=\"http:\/\/doc.weblogs.com\/2006\/11\/14\">writes<\/a>, as I <a href=\"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/archives\/2006\/11\/the_art_of_defe.php\">wrote<\/a> yesterday, on Ted Leonsis&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/11\/12\/AR2006111200804.html\">strategy<\/a> of using a blog to manipulate what people see when they google his name. I had called Leonsis&#8217;s strategy Machiavellian, and asserted it ran counter to the conversational ethic of the cluetrainers. Searls agrees, and disagrees: &#8220;Ted is being both Machiavelli <em>and<\/em> Cluetrain compliant. (It isn&#8217;t like the guy <i>isn&#8217;t<\/i> getting clues, is it? He&#8217;s not bunkered down in what Dr. Weinberger aptly called Fort Business.)&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Cluetrain Manifesto was written at the end of the 90s, and it catches and reflects the spirit of that heady time. Back then, the hyperlink did feel like a subversive tool, a virtualized and more subtle version of a Molotov Cocktail. There didn&#8217;t seem to be much symmetry or plan to linking. It <em>was<\/em> messy &#8211; a free-for-all. And for those of us who aren&#8217;t fond of bureaucracies or artificial hierarchies, it was liberating. Or, at least, fun.<\/p>\n<p>But can we still say that hyperlinks subvert hierarchies, that they have neither symmetry nor plan? I think Doc Searls needs to look a little more closely at what Leonsis&#8217;s blog strategy is telling us. He was able to control the conversation, to get the content he wanted to the top of Google&#8217;s results, through a simple, three-pronged strategy for attracting links: use his position as a leading business executive to gain attention, use his meetings with celebrities to gain attention, and use links to popular bloggers to gain attention. Leading business executive, celebrities, popular bloggers: This is entirely about using social or professional hierarchies to manipulate hierarchies of information. It&#8217;s about understanding the plan and the symmetry that have come to define &#8211; not entirely, but in large part &#8211; the flow of information on today&#8217;s PageRanked web. It&#8217;s about seeing the structure in the mirage of messiness. It&#8217;s about being &#8220;clued in,&#8221; though not at all in the cluetrainers&#8217; sense of that phrase.<\/p>\n<p>What Leonsis is doing, in short, is working the system. And isn&#8217;t that what climbing and controlling hierarchies have always been about?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Hyperlinks,&#8221; David Weinberger wrote in the Cluetrain Manifesto, &#8220;subvert hierarchy &#8230; Hyperlinks have no symmetry, no plan. They are messy.&#8221; I found those words through &#8211; surprise &#8211; a hyperlink. And I found that link, via another link, on Doc Searls&#8217;s blog, where today he writes, as I wrote yesterday, on Ted Leonsis&#8217;s strategy of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}