{"id":29,"date":"2005-05-03T00:29:29","date_gmt":"2005-05-03T06:29:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=29"},"modified":"2005-05-03T00:29:29","modified_gmt":"2005-05-03T06:29:29","slug":"how_ivory_is_yo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=29","title":{"rendered":"How ivory is your tower?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Warren Bennis and James O\u2019Toole are the latest big-name business professors to stride into the public square and flagellate themselves. Following, among others, Stanford&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/gobi.stanford.edu\/researchpapers\/detail1.asp?Document_ID=2523\">Jeffrey Pfeffer<\/a>, McGill&#8217;s <a href=http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/1576752755\/amazingbooks0b0\">Henry Mintzberg<\/a> and the late <a href=\"http:\/\/aom.pace.edu\/AMLE\/AMLEVolume4Issue1pp75-91.pdf\">Sumantra Ghoshal<\/a> of the London Business School, they&#8217;ve written an indictment of management education, arguing that &#8220;business schools are on the wrong track.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu\/b01\/en\/hbr\/hbrsa\/current\/0505\/article\/R0505FPrint.jhtml\">How Business Schools Lost Their Way<\/a>,&#8221; a long article in the current Harvard Business Review, Bennis and O&#8217;Toole charge b-schools with having &#8220;succumbed to physics envy and the scientism it spawns.&#8221; Yearning to be taken seriously as &#8220;an academic discipline like chemistry or geology,&#8221; management education has &#8220;adopted a model of science that uses abstract financial and economic analysis, statistical multiple regressions, and laboratory psychology.&#8221; Little of the research &#8220;is grounded in actual business practices.&#8221; In striving for academic respectability, in other words, b-schools have succeeded only in diminishing their relevance.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a valid criticism. Even by the standards of the social sciences, &#8220;management&#8221; is an awfully squishy field, and attempts to prove otherwise are at best quixotic and at worst self-destructive. (It&#8217;s no coincidence that the great academic treatises on business management have tended to come from economists and psychologists rather than management scholars.) Bennis and O&#8217;Toole are certainly correct in saying that the research coming out of business schools tends to be far removed from the challenges faced by real managers. Back when I was an editor at HBR, I spent a lot of time plowing through turgid academic papers trying to turn up nuggets of practical wisdom. They were dispiritingly rare.<\/p>\n<p>But having made an important and tough point, the authors go soft. Rather than being an academic discipline, they write, &#8220;business is a profession, akin to medicine and the law, and business schools are professional schools\u2014or should be.&#8221; This amounts to little more than replacing one elitist delusion with another. Business is not at all a \u201cprofession\u201d the way law or medicine is. Managers are not distinguished by their deep understanding of a shared, specialized and rigorously defined body of knowledge, as lawyers and doctors are. Think of it this way: You wouldn\u2019t want an untrained amateur to operate on your heart or defend you in a trial, but you\u2019d happily hire a bright, effective, energetic man or woman to be a manager in your company, even if that person didn\u2019t have an M.B.A. or other formal business training.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s face it: Good management is, roughly, 30% common sense, 30% analytical acumen, 30% personal charm, 8% ruthlessness and 2% specialized knowledge. You&#8217;re not going to get management education on the right track unless you&#8217;re willing to be honest about what management is.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Business professors are beating themselves up again<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}