{"id":281,"date":"2006-03-08T09:08:00","date_gmt":"2006-03-08T16:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=281"},"modified":"2006-03-08T09:08:00","modified_gmt":"2006-03-08T16:08:00","slug":"i_owe_an_apolog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=281","title":{"rendered":"Easier said than done"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I owe an apology to Tom Glocer. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/archives\/2006\/03\/getting_it.php\">discussing a speech<\/a> he gave last week, I wrote that the Reuters CEO had implied that traditional media&#8217;s role in the future would be essentially that of &#8220;an enabler of the MySpace world.&#8221; Glocer has <a href=\"http:\/\/news.ft.com\/cms\/s\/e2bba176-ae0a-11da-8ffb-0000779e2340.html\">a column<\/a> in this morning&#8217;s Financial Times that appears to be based on his speech. It&#8217;s clear, in reading his article, which is titled &#8220;Old Media Must Embrace the Amateur,&#8221;  that I oversimplified his points considerably. (I guess that&#8217;s what I get for relying on the report of a live-blogger with an agenda. Shame on me.)<\/p>\n<p>Glocer is a little too fond of faddish techno-platitudes, but his vision is not of a future in which professional journalism becomes the handmaiden of amateur journalism, but rather of one in which both exist in harmony, each supplementing the other&#8217;s strengths and countering the other&#8217;s weaknesses. I share Glocer&#8217;s hope &#8211; though not his optimism &#8211; that this is how things will work out in the media business. I&#8217;ve been pigeon-holed, by some, as being &#8220;anti-amateur&#8221; because I had the temerity to point out the shortcomings of amateurs &#8211; and the advantages of professionals &#8211; in my post <a href=\"http:\/\/news.ft.com\/cms\/s\/e2bba176-ae0a-11da-8ffb-0000779e2340.html\">The Amorality of Web 2.0<\/a> last year. But, as I wrote back then, &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to be forced to make [a] choice&#8221; between amateur and professional content; I, too, value and desire both. My fear, as I explained, is that the internet is shifting the economics of media in favor of amateur-created content, and that, as companies respond to the new economic incentives, the amateur will gain hegemony.<\/p>\n<p>Glocer doesn&#8217;t address the difficult economic issues in his column. He sidesteps the question Martin Nisenholz posed at the start of that conference last week: &#8220;How do we create high quality content in a world where advertisers want to pay by the click, and consumers don&#8217;t want to pay at all?&#8221; In fact, Glocer simply glosses over the economics. He writes, to his colleagues in &#8220;old media,&#8221; &#8220;There is no doubt that our businesses will be stronger if we employ a more collective and open-minded approach to content.&#8221; That sounds inoffensive enough, but the &#8220;no doubt&#8221; is facile. I hope Glocer is a little more forthcoming and concrete when he talks to Reuters employees about media&#8217;s allegedly rosy future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I owe an apology to Tom Glocer. In discussing a speech he gave last week, I wrote that the Reuters CEO had implied that traditional media&#8217;s role in the future would be essentially that of &#8220;an enabler of the MySpace world.&#8221; Glocer has a column in this morning&#8217;s Financial Times that appears to be based [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}