{"id":232,"date":"2006-01-26T15:29:54","date_gmt":"2006-01-26T22:29:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=232"},"modified":"2006-01-26T15:29:54","modified_gmt":"2006-01-26T22:29:54","slug":"down_the_drain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=232","title":{"rendered":"Down the drain"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/01\/22\/opinion\/22carr.html?ex=1264136400&#038;en=98b871434dfd82ad&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland\">footsteps<\/a> of McDonald&#8217;s, Ford, the FBI and many others, Lloyd&#8217;s of London has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/money\/main.jhtml?xml=\/money\/2006\/01\/25\/cnlloyd25.xml&#038;menuId=242&#038;sSheet=\/money\/2006\/01\/25\/ixcitytop.html\">pulled the plug<\/a> on a big, expensive, and now embarrassing software project. Launched five years ago, the effort was aimed at modernizing the venerable insurance group&#8217;s brokering processes and making them &#8220;paperless.&#8221; But the new system never enticed users to actually use it &#8211; the cure turned out to be worse than the disease. Lloyd&#8217;s ended up wasting 70 million pounds &#8211; about $125 million &#8211; on the project before chief executive Michael Dawson concluded this week that &#8220;the platform was not optimal in ensuring more efficient business processes for the Lloyd&#8217;s and London market and as a result it will close.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>There are three lessons here. First is that the bigger the software project, the more likely it is to collapse under its own weight. $100 million seems like the line beyond which failure is almost assured. Second is that you should always create software to solve the day-to-day problems faced by the actual users, not to meet big abstract organizational challenges. Solve enough little problems, and the big ones take care of themselves. Fail to make users&#8217; lives easier, and they&#8217;ll simply bypass the system (and never trust anything you do ever again). Third and finally, you should never give a software project a catchy codename. For Ford, it was Project Everest; for McDonald&#8217;s, it was Project Innovate; for Lloyd&#8217;s, it was Project Kinnect. If you&#8217;re about to launch an IT initiative big enough to warrant its own name, you should probably make sure you have a really good golden parachute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following in the footsteps of McDonald&#8217;s, Ford, the FBI and many others, Lloyd&#8217;s of London has pulled the plug on a big, expensive, and now embarrassing software project. Launched five years ago, the effort was aimed at modernizing the venerable insurance group&#8217;s brokering processes and making them &#8220;paperless.&#8221; But the new system never enticed users [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}