{"id":224,"date":"2006-01-18T10:49:04","date_gmt":"2006-01-18T17:49:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=224"},"modified":"2006-01-18T10:49:04","modified_gmt":"2006-01-18T17:49:04","slug":"yahoo_passes_a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=224","title":{"rendered":"Yahoo passes a stone"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I had thought the big internet news yesterday was the announcement that the online casino GoldenPalace.com had bought William Shatner&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20060118\/ap_en_tv\/people_shatner\">kidney stone<\/a> for $25,000. But Yahoo&#8217;s earnings shortfall seems to have trumped Captain Kirk&#8217;s offal windfall.<\/p>\n<p>Yahoo reported strong growth throughout its business, but it came up a penny short of Wall Street&#8217;s expectations on its earnings-per-share number. Given that Wall Street&#8217;s real expectation was that Yahoo would beat Wall Street&#8217;s expectations (got that?), the shortfall is causing a big fall in Yahoo&#8217;s stock this morning, as well as collateral damage to Google and other internet stocks.  What&#8217;s probably making investors more antsy than that missing penny, though, is Yahoo&#8217;s admission that it&#8217;s having trouble &#8220;monetizing&#8221; its search results. Facing fierce competition from Google, and impending competition from Microsoft&#8217;s MSN network, its profit margin in paid search appears to be getting squeezed. The increasing competition in the online ad market means, moreover, that the squeeze will probably get worse. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/01\/18\/technology\/18yahoo.html?ex=1295240400&#038;en=9c79812dea70fcd8&#038;ei=5089&#038;partner=rssyahoo&#038;emc=rss\">Reported<\/a> the New York Times: &#8220;In forecasting a slowdown in growth, the company said it would have to give other Web sites a greater share of the money it took in from selling ads on their sites.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Steve Rubell sees the Google results as heralding a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.micropersuasion.com\/2006\/01\/web_20_doesnt_m.html\">Web 2.0 crash<\/a>: Sell Google, he says, and &#8220;if you&#8217;re a start-up hoping to pin your business on advertising, get to higher ground.&#8221; Wall Street seems to have some sympathy for Rubell&#8217;s view, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thestreet.com\/_yahoo\/tech\/internet\/10262356.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&#038;cm_cat=FREE&#038;cm_ite=NA\">two analysts<\/a> have already cut their ratings on Google to &#8220;sell.&#8221; Business 2.0&#8217;s Owen Thomas, though, says the fears are overblown. He <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2006\/01\/18\/technology\/yahoo_biz2.0\/index.htm\">sees<\/a> in Yahoo&#8217;s numbers a confirmation that the skies ahead are still a cloudless blue. According to Thomas, &#8220;nothing in Yahoo&#8217;s earnings suggested that the company&#8217;s strategy or execution is off course, save for the trouble with search monetization.&#8221; Then again, investors&#8217; enthusiasm for Web 2.0 is largely built on rosy scenarios about pay-per-click advertising, so &#8220;trouble in search monetization&#8221; is, well, trouble. The question is: Is this a blip or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/archives\/2005\/12\/competition_and.php\">a trend<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>In describing his very expensive kidney stone yesterday, Shatner said, &#8220;If you subjected it to extreme heat, it might turn out to be a diamond.&#8221; Or was he talking about Web 2.0?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I had thought the big internet news yesterday was the announcement that the online casino GoldenPalace.com had bought William Shatner&#8217;s kidney stone for $25,000. But Yahoo&#8217;s earnings shortfall seems to have trumped Captain Kirk&#8217;s offal windfall. Yahoo reported strong growth throughout its business, but it came up a penny short of Wall Street&#8217;s expectations on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=224"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}