{"id":2173,"date":"2012-11-27T14:29:04","date_gmt":"2012-11-27T21:29:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=2173"},"modified":"2012-11-28T03:40:39","modified_gmt":"2012-11-28T10:40:39","slug":"moral-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=2173","title":{"rendered":"Moral code"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So you&#8217;re happily tweeting away as your Google self-driving car crosses a bridge, its speed precisely synced to the 50 m.p.h. limit. A group of frisky schoolchildren is also heading across the bridge, on the pedestrian walkway. Suddenly, there&#8217;s a tussle, and three of the kids are pushed into the road, right in your vehicle&#8217;s path. Your self-driving car has a fraction of a second to make a choice: Either it swerves off the bridge, possibly killing you, or it runs over the children. What does the Google algorithm tell it to do?<\/p>\n<p>This is the type of scenario that NYU psychology professor Gary Marcus considers as he <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/online\/blogs\/newsdesk\/2012\/11\/google-driverless-car-morality.html\">ponders<\/a> the rapid approach of\u00a0a time when &#8220;it will no longer be optional for machines to have ethical systems.&#8221; As we begin to have computer-controlled cars, robots, and other machines operating autonomously out in the chaotic human world, situations will inevitably arise in which the software has to choose between a set of bad, even horrible, alternatives. How do you program a computer to choose the lesser of two evils? What are the criteria, and how do you weigh them? Since we humans aren&#8217;t very good at codifying responses to moral dilemmas ourselves, particularly when the precise contours of a dilemma can&#8217;t be predicted ahead of its occurrence, programmers will find themselves in an extraordinarily difficult situation. And one assumes that they will carry a moral, not to mention a legal, burden for the code they write.<\/p>\n<p>The military, which already operates automated killing machines, will likely be the first to struggle in earnest with the problem. Indeed, as Spencer Ackerman <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/dangerroom\/2012\/11\/human-robot-kill\/\">noted<\/a> yesterday, the U.S. Department of Defense has just issued a <a href=\"http:\/\/cryptome.org\/dodi\/dodd-3000-09.pdf\">directive<\/a>\u00a0that establishes rules &#8220;designed to minimize the probability and consequences of failures in autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems that could lead to unintended engagements.&#8221; One thing the Pentagon hopes to ensure is that, when autonomous weapons use force, &#8220;appropriate levels of human judgment&#8221; are incorporated into the decisions.\u00a0But nowhere is the world more chaotic than in a war zone, and as fighting machines gain more sophistication and autonomy and are given more responsibility, &#8220;unintended engagements&#8221; will happen. Barring some major shift in strategy, a military robot or drone will eventually be in an ambiguous situation and have to make a split-second decision with lethal consequences. Shoot, or hold fire?<\/p>\n<p>We don&#8217;t even really know what a conscience is, but somebody&#8217;s going to have to program one nonetheless.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So you&#8217;re happily tweeting away as your Google self-driving car crosses a bridge, its speed precisely synced to the 50 m.p.h. limit. A group of frisky schoolchildren is also heading across the bridge, on the pedestrian walkway. Suddenly, there&#8217;s a tussle, and three of the kids are pushed into the road, right in your vehicle&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2173"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2176,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2173\/revisions\/2176"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}