{"id":138,"date":"2005-10-29T17:08:58","date_gmt":"2005-10-29T23:08:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/wp\/?p=138"},"modified":"2015-02-26T08:09:28","modified_gmt":"2015-02-26T15:09:28","slug":"wireless_10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/?p=138","title":{"rendered":"Wireless 1.0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As anybody who&#8217;s read my work knows, I&#8217;m fascinated by the utopianism that springs up whenever a major new technology comes along. I recently picked up a collection of essays on this theme, called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0262031159\/amazingbooks0b0\">Imagining Tomorrow<\/a>, which was published in 1986 by the MIT Press. One of the essays, by Susan J. Douglas, looks at the excitement set off by Marconi&#8217;s introduction of radio &#8211; the &#8220;wireless telegraph&#8221; &#8211; to the American public in 1899. &#8220;Wireless held a special place in the American imagination precisely because it married idealism and adventure with science,&#8221; she writes.<\/p>\n<p>The invention stirred dreams of a more perfect world, expressed in language that won&#8217;t sound unfamiliar to today&#8217;s readers:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Popular Science Monthly<\/em> observed: &#8220;The nerves of the whole world are, so to speak, being bound together, so that a touch in one country is transmitted instantly to a far-distant one.&#8221; Implicit in this organic metaphor was the belief that a world so physically connected would become a spiritual whole with common interests and goals. The <em>New York Times<\/em> added: &#8220;Nothing so fosters and promotes a mutual understanding and a community of sentiment and interests as cheap, speedy and convenient communication.&#8221; Articles suggested that this technology could make men more rational; with better communications available, misunderstandings could be avoided. These visions suggested that machines, by themselves, could change history; the right invention could help people overcome human foibles and weaknesses.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <em>Atlantic Monthly<\/em> even published a sonnet titled &#8220;Wireless Telegraphy&#8221; that ended with these lines:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Somewhere beyond the league-long silences,<\/p>\n<p>Somewhere across the spaces of the years,<\/p>\n<p>A heart will thrill to thee, a voice will bless,<\/p>\n<p>Love will awake and life be perfected!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The rise of wireless also set off a popular movement to democratize media, as hundreds of thousands of &#8220;amateur operators&#8221; took to the airwaves. It was the original blogosphere. &#8220;On every night after dinner,&#8221; wrote Francis Collins in the 1912 book <em>Wireless Man<\/em>, &#8220;the entire country becomes a vast whispering gallery.&#8221; The amateurs, Douglas reports, &#8220;claimed to be surrogates for &#8216;the people.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But it didn&#8217;t last. By the 1920s, radio had become &#8220;firmly embedded in a corporate grid.&#8221; People happily went back to being passive consumers: &#8220;In the 1920s there was little mention of world peace or of anyone&#8217;s ability to track down a long-lost friend or relative halfway around the world. In fact, there were not many thousands of message senders, only a few &#8230; Thus, through radio, Americans would not transcend the present or circumvent corporate networks. In fact they would be more closely tied to both.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As anybody who&#8217;s read my work knows, I&#8217;m fascinated by the utopianism that springs up whenever a major new technology comes along. I recently picked up a collection of essays on this theme, called Imagining Tomorrow, which was published in 1986 by the MIT Press. One of the essays, by Susan J. Douglas, looks at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[17,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=138"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5647,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138\/revisions\/5647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.roughtype.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}