
« Xeroxing the brain | Main | Cloud as a feature »
Post-pixel
November 24, 2008
Where did the pixels go? Not so long ago, you couldn't look at type on a computer without seeing the ghost of the screen's pixel grid behind it. But as screen resolutions have improved (thank you, Moore's Law), pixels have become at once far more plentiful and far less visible. Indeed, the pixel has all but disappeared. Look hard at what you're reading: Can you see one?
Jason Kottke points to a fascinating little essay on the death of the pixel by type designer Jonathan Hoefler. Digital designers long struggled with the tension between graceful letterforms and the clumsy, pointillist grid on which they had to be rendered. But, as Hoefler points out, the struggle was nothing new. Hundreds of years ago, words were routinely embroidered on fabric, requiring the adaptation of type to a rough pixel grid. "Renaissance ‘lace books’ have much to offer the modern digital designer," writes Hoefler, "who also faces the challenge of portraying clear and replicable images in a constrained environment."
But, Hoefler goes on, that age-old challenge is going away: "Pixels were the stuff of my first computer, which strained to show 137 of them in a square inch; my latest cellphone manages 32,562 in this same space, and has 65,000 colors to choose from, not eight. Its smooth anti-aliased type helps conceal the underlying matrix of pixels, which are nearly as invisible as the grains of silver halide on a piece of film." The pixel's existence is "moribund," and it's only going to become more so: "Crisp cellphone screens aren’t the end of the story. There are already sharper displays on handheld remote controls and consumer-grade cameras, and monitors supporting the tremendous WQUXGA resolution of 3840×2400 are making their way from medical labs to living rooms."
So what's left for the once-mighty pixel? "It’s likely that the pixel’s final and most enduring role will be a shabby one, serving as an out-of-touch visual cliché to connote 'the digital age.'"
That's kind of touching. Honestly, I hardly even noticed that pixels had disappeared until I read Hoefler's essay. And now I find myself a wee bit nostalgic for the little sons of bitches.
Advertisement: Are you ready for "The Big Switch"? Nicholas Carr's new book "is the best read so far about the significance of the shift to cloud computing," says the Financial Times. The Independent says it's "lucid and mind-boggling." Order now from Amazon.com.
Comments
You surely got that of your chest Nick! Here is a line of clothing that might appeal to you, before you collect yourself! Alan
http://www.cafepress.com/ironicsans/1843266
Posted by: alan
at November 24, 2008 05:00 PM
And some furniture! Alan
http://www.geekologie.com/2008/04/01/pixel-sofa.jpg
Posted by: alan
at November 24, 2008 05:06 PM
Pixels are "going away" in about the same way that transistors already have: not at all. They're just getting smaller, and less necessary for most people to think about at an individual level.
Posted by: finn
at November 24, 2008 05:12 PM
Pixels are not dead! Like in Finland, people are enjoying pixel art on their streets. Take a look at this gallery of street art!
http://alexeysmirnov.name/photo/thumbnails.php?album=20
Posted by: Alexey
at November 25, 2008 05:17 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)Work in progress:
The Shallows
Nick's new book:
"Future Shock for the web-apps era" -Fast Company
"Ominously prescient" -Kirkus Reviews
"Riveting stuff" -New York Post
Greatest hits
Avatars consume as much electricity as Brazilians
The love song of J. Alfred Prufrock's avatar
Flight of the wingless coffin fly
Other writing
The end of corporate computing
Nick's last book:
Order from Amazon
Visit book site