« 2007 predictions | Main | The semantics web »
Reverse salients
December 01, 2006
There was a time, in the distant past, when technology mainly took the form of simple tools, each used for a particular purpose. But technology gets more complicated as it advances. The simple tools become more elaborate, and they begin to merge into ever more complex systems. Today, a lot of the products that companies produce are components of much larger systems, and the success of those products can hinge as much on the other components of the systems as on their own particular qualities. Making sense of the systems and, in particular, how they're likely to evolve can give a company a big advantage over less insightful competitors.
But making sense of technological systems is hard.
One of the best ways to think about how such systems progress is through the idea of "reverse salients." The great technology historian Thomas P. Hughes introduced the phrase, in the context of technological innovation, is his book on the development of electric power systems, Networks of Power. He borrowed the term from military jargon, where it referred to a section of an advancing force that falls behind the front and hence slows the progress of the attack. Technological systems, he showed, advance in a similar way. Progress is held up when a reverse salient forms in some component or subsystem, but then begins again when the problem is solved - until the next reverse salient forms.
In my new column on business innovation for Strategy & Business, "The Weakest Link," I describe how the idea of reverse salients can also help companies make smart decisions about where to invest in innovation and where to look for competitive advantage. The article begins with the story of how a tiny strip of rubber played a crucial role in determining the course of modern aircraft design.
Advertisement: Are you ready for "The Big Switch"? Nicholas Carr's new book "is the best read so far about the significance of the shift to cloud computing," says the Financial Times. The Independent says it's "lucid and mind-boggling." Order now from Amazon.com.
Comments
"Reverse salient" just sounds like a new synonym for "limiting factor".
Re innovation & limiting factors, The Innovator's Dilemma is pretty good on the topic, on the way innovations move around the "stack" of an industry.
Posted by: Barry Kelly ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.roughtype.com/nav-commenters.gif)
at December 1, 2006 01:45 AM
Barry,
The two terms are certainly related, but "reverse salient" has a more specific meaning. By the way, Hughes's book came out in 1983, so the term isn't exactly "new."
Thanks.
Nick
Posted by: Nick Carr at December 1, 2006 09:12 AM
I am not convinced about your discussion of open source development models applies to overcoming "reverse salients". As you state, open source has proven to be an effective method of continually enhancing existing programs, rather than addressing factors that are limiting the use of those programs (unless you count cost as a revese salient).
Posted by: Neil Macehiter at December 1, 2006 12:49 PM
Great article -- thanks!
Posted by: Sid Steward at December 1, 2006 01:41 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Work in progress:
The Shallows
Nick's new book:
"Future Shock for the web-apps era" -Fast Company
"Ominously prescient" -Kirkus Reviews
"Riveting stuff" -New York Post
Greatest hits
Avatars consume as much electricity as Brazilians
The love song of J. Alfred Prufrock's avatar
Flight of the wingless coffin fly
Other writing
The end of corporate computing
Nick's last book:
Order from Amazon
Visit book site