<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Buying eyeballs</title>
<link>http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/12/buying_eyes.php</link>
<description>Thanks to a link from John Battelle, I came across a fascinating little article about an appearance by Bill Gates on Indian television earlier this week. Noting that Google's "business model is based on advertisements from which they make a lot of money" and that "Google keeps all of the money with itself," Gates said that Microsoft intends to "share a part of its advertising revenues from its search engine with users" - by giving...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Sharing Search-Ad Revenue with Users?</title>
<link>http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2005/12/10/index.php#000895</link>
<description>An interesting debate has been brewing in the blogosphere about the implications of recent comments by Bill Gates, which were reported by John Ribeiro of IDG News Service. Microsoft Corp. will share a part of its advertising revenues from its...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sharing Search-Ad Revenue with Users?</title>
<link>http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2005/12/10/index.php#000895</link>
<description>An interesting debate has been brewing in the blogosphere about the implications of recent comments by Bill Gates, which were reported by John Ribeiro of IDG News Service. Gates said that search engines like Google&amp;#8230;get their revenues from adverti...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sharing Search-Ad Revenue with Users?</title>
<link>http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2005/12/10/index.php#000895</link>
<description>An interesting debate has been brewing in the blogosphere about the implications of recent comments by Bill Gates, which were reported by John Ribeiro of IDG News Service. Gates said that search engines like Google&amp;#8230;get their revenues from adverti...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doc Searls On Trumpets, Cannons and Google ....</title>
<link>http://blog.qumana.com/blog/_archives/2005/12/10/1444638.html</link>
<description>The last few days have seen a lot of muttering about Bill Gates&apos; announced intentions to put a new twist ...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSN to target Google&amp;#8217;s Achille&amp;#8217;s Steal?</title>
<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/?p=2716</link>
<description>	This is Bill Gates, the richest man in America, just talking at this point, but while visiting with an Indian television channel he pointed an MSN missile at Google&amp;#8217;s ad territory:
In its bid to share revenues with users, Microsoft may give free...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>ON MICROSOFT DISRUPTING GOOGLE&apos;S BUSINESS MODEL</title>
<link>http://mp.blogs.com/mp/2005/12/s_18.html</link>
<description>GO FOR THE JUGULAR Reading Nicholas Carr&apos;s post on Bill Gates&apos; epiphany on Google&apos;s model (via Infoworld) brought on a woozy case of deja vu this evening:Microsoft (Profile, Products, Articles) Corp. will share a part of its advertising revenues from i...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mitch Ratcliffe, Nicholas Carr and Greg Yardley on Paying (for) Attention</title>
<link>http://attentiontrust.org/node/127</link>
<description>Commenting on the news that Microsoft will is planning to share search ad revenues with users, Mitch Ratcliffe writes:
This may be the shortest route to paying people for their attention, yet. Say what you will about Microsoft, but this is a smart move. H</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>