<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Lies, damned lies and IT statistics</title>
<link>http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/11/lies_damned_lie.php</link>
<description>The latest issue of SAP's Business Flash newsletter just popped into my in-box. Under the email's catchy headline "Companies That Run SAP Have 32% More High Fives At Their Staff Meetings" runs this sentence: "A recent study of companies listed on NASDAQ and NYSE found that companies that run SAP are 32% more profitable than those that don’t." At the end of the sentence is an asterisk that leads to a footnote: "Based on a...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>phentermine</title>
<link>http://phentermine.one-phentermine.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[adipex  <a href="http://adipex.one-phentermine.com">adipex </a>
texas holdem  <a href="http://texas-holdem.gweeb.com">texas holdem </a>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SAP&amp;#8217;s Ad Campaign - Credible? Meaningful?</title>
<link>http://valuemadevisible.com/blog/?p=2</link>
<description>	SAP has been running a major ad campaign with the basic message: &amp;#8220;Companies that run SAP are 32% more profitable than those that don’t.&amp;#8221;   Nicholas Carr has posted his skeptical comments here.  I, too, attempted to learn more about the d...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Statistics for Dummies</title>
<link>http://nitnblogs.blogspot.com/2005/11/statistics-for-dummies.html</link>
<description>Interesting.  Assuming that people who buy any Software or Hardware are capable (can question and dig deep into the research facts), have multi-million dollar budgets, and consider IT to be a strategic investment (not like ordering supplies for offic...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SAP&amp;#8217;s Bait and Switch</title>
<link>http://www.ericbgriffin.com/archives/saps-bait-and-switch</link>
<description><![CDATA[	On his blog Nicholas Carr talks about a bait and switch conducted by SAP during a newsletter he recieved. The newsletter makes some impressive&nbsp;claims but&nbsp;then didn&#8217;t deliver the goods upon his further investigation.&nbsp;Its a classic ...]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>