<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Fair or unfair use?</title>
<link>http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/11/unlikely_bedfel.php</link>
<description>Unlikely bedfellows Pat Schroeder and Bob Barr team up to make a case against Google Print in an op-ed in the Washington Times today. The piece is a response to Google CEO Eric Schmidt's recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. Unfortunately, the Schroeder/Barr article is as shrill as Schmidt's was self-righteous. At one point, they write, "Not only is Google trying to rewrite copyright law, it is also crushing creativity. If publishers and authors...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>family sex</title>
<link>http://dlwgraphics.com/incest.htm</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://dlwgraphics.com/incest.htm">family sex</a> <a href="http://dlwgraphics.com/incest.htm">incest porn</a> <a href="http://dlwgraphics.com/incest.htm">incest porn</a> <a href="http://dlwgraphics.com/incest.htm">incest pics</a>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>What&apos;s The Difference Between Google Print And A Bricks-And-Mortar Bookshop?</title>
<link>http://smokey.rhs.com/web/blog/PowerOfTheSchwartz.nsf/d6plinks/RSCZ-6HFSTC</link>
<description>... How can it be true that Google is opening no new questions in copyright when they are clearly doing something that nobody else has done before by scanning so many books? I say that it&apos;s just a matter of scale, and I&apos;ll explain why...
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>